Please enter your password to continue.
The biochemists behind Scalisi Skincare spent years perfecting this potent moisturizer. A triple threat, it’s proven to fill in even your most prominent wrinkles while also keeping your skin moisturized and protected from the sun. Despite these hard-hitting benefits, the formula is incredibly lightweight. Plus, it smells amazing—the faintly floral scent is a far cry from eau de SPF.
Used this anti-aging moisturizer for one week and loved the way my skin drank it up and felt after.4
This product worked ok but didn't wow me. I use a similar product that I'm happy with so will not be purchasing this.4
I have very dry skin and this moisturizer was ineffective.3
I really liked this moisturizer. It feels very nice and smooth and I prefer to use an anti-aging cream. I would definitely use this product in the future.5
Could not tell a difference on any anti aging, but I could tell a difference in the feeling in my skin. It was definitely oily in area that were normally not a problem. I was disappointed.4
The only reason I would not purchase this is because I liked the previous lotion with SPF I received in my July box a smidge more. That being said, I was very happy with this product and would recommend it! It is not thick and oily. Perfect amount of hydration without clogging pores or disrupting my make up. I enjoyed the sample.4
I liked that this lotion didn't burn even though it had spf in it. My skin is sensitive and I have that problem a lot.3
I haven't been able to see any beneficial effects of the product yet. I assume the anti-aging comes from the SPF in the product. It's a little bit heavy, however I work outside part of the time so I do like the added spf protection to my skin.4
The Scalisi Moisturizer felt very nice. I used it on my neck area and liked the way it made my skin feel. Would use again!!
This seemed like any other moisturizer with sunscreen I have tried. I would not pay that much money for a so-so product. I can't tell if the other claims were true because there wasn't a big enough sample for that.4