Create a free account to check out faster, store multiple shipping addresses, view and track your orders in your account, and much more.
Please enter your password to continue.
When perfumer Romano Ricci set out to create an elegant ode to the classic rose, his noble intentions were foiled by a lab technician who accidently added too much cetalox, a synthetic substitute for grey amber, to the mix. The serendipitous mistake turned out for the best, since it resulted in Mad Madame, a bewitching blend of sophisticated notes and modern musky scents.
I was not a fan of this scent at all. I put it on and actually took a shower just to get it off. I was way too strong for me and I was hoping it would fade but just couldn't stand it. Not a fan!1
I didn't really like the scent, too musky-manly for me. I'm not sure how to describe it... Oh well! I guess I'm more interested in therosy-citrus smell.1
Not my type of fragrance but I am sure I can find someone else who would like it1
This scent is just to powdery and strong for me. Not a fan1
This perfume has a really musky scent with hints of rose. I find it to be too strong for my preference. When I tried it on, my sister asked if I was wearing menâ€™s cologne, and I had only dabbed a bit inside my wrists. A little goes a long way.1
just not for me! i like natural and fruity scents, and this was not!1
I didn't like the smell of this perfume at all. It was way too strong for my taste. I prefer something softer and fresher.1
This perfume is too strong for my taste. However, it lasts forever. So if you like it, I think it's worth your money.1
There is hypothetically nothing wrong with this perfume, I just don't like the scent. I'm fussy with my smells. I usually use the very vanilla-y scents or brown sugar type of scents. This reminded me more of a vintage scent.1
The scent was awful. Chemical scent mixed with roses. I guess it would be nice for someone who worked for a fertilizer company...that scent might appeal to them.1